<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coastal Science &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coastalscience.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coastalscience.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 14:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>CSE Awarded 2025-2027 SCDES BCM Beach Erosion Data Project Contract</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-awarded-2025-2027-scdes-bcm-beach-erosion-data-project-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-awarded-2025-2027-scdes-bcm-beach-erosion-data-project-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=4375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans'; color: #000000;"><a href="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/BERM-Photo.png"><img class="alignright wp-image-4377" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/BERM-Photo-300x216.png" alt="BERM Photo" width="400" height="288" /></a></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans'; color: #000000;">CSE is pleased to continue our 11-year partnership with the South Carolina Department of Environmental Services, Bureau of Coastal Management (SCDES BCM – formerly OCRM) to monitor South Carolina’s beaches through their BERM (Beach Erosion Research and Monitoring) project. After recently completing our 2022-2024 monitoring agreement, we are honored to be awarded the 2025-2027 contract–continuing services provided to the state since 2013. Coastal monitoring is critical to the SCDES BCM coastal zone management program. This monitoring documents the health and condition of South Carolina beaches. It provides data to help managers identify environmental impacts, avoid future adverse impacts, determine renourishment needs, improve storm protection, and manage beach and dune growth or recession.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans'; color: #000000;">The BERM project encompasses ~110 miles of South Carolina’s developed sections of coastline (divided into 397 transects), including three state parks and one uninhabited island (Waties Island). Monitoring is broken down by location and season and scheduled over a year. Coastal surveys are conducted on land and overwater. Land-based (topographic) surveys measure the beach and dune using a survey rod and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver. Overwater (bathymetric) data is collected on a marine vessel equipped with underwater survey equipment. These surveys are also documented with aerial and panoramic imagery captured by unmanned aerial systems (UAS). Each year, CSE collects and processes data at all SCDES BCM survey sites and provides digital files to the agency for review and documentation.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans'; color: #000000;">CSE brings to this project the longest history of beach monitoring in South Carolina. For 40 years, CSE has collected topographic and bathymetric data on almost every beach and inlet in the state. Our staff is intimately familiar with South Carolina’s coastline based on prior experience mapping shorelines, designing beach nourishment projects, and performing annual monitoring for several communities. CSE values the trust SCDES BCM has placed in our monitoring services. We look forward to supporting the BERM project for another three years.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans'; color: #000000;"> </span></p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-awarded-2025-2027-scdes-bcm-beach-erosion-data-project-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSE Attends SC Beach Advocates 2025 Annual Meeting</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-attends-sc-beach-advocates-2025-annual-meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-attends-sc-beach-advocates-2025-annual-meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=4381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/SC-Beach-Advocates-Inside.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4384" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/SC-Beach-Advocates-Inside.jpg" alt="SC Beach Advocates Inside" width="856" height="224" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">January 16-17, CSE attends the South Carolina Beach Advocates 2025 Annual Meeting in Isle of Palms, SC, to present beach management updates for 2024-2025 non-federal projects. This conference brings together leaders and industry experts to engage in insightful conversations about protecting South Carolina’s coastline. These discussions include beach management challenges for South Carolina communities, coastal legislative updates, and beach nourishment initiatives.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">The South Carolina Beach Advocates is a nonprofit organization formed in 2015 by mayors and administrators of the state&#8217;s beach communities to advocate for South Carolina beach preservation. Its mission is to educate the public, governmental authorities, and elected officials on the environmental, economic, and societal impact of South Carolina&#8217;s beaches and inlets on communities. South Carolina&#8217;s beaches provide critical habitat and protection from storms and serve as one of the most vital economic engines in the state.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">CSE is a proud sponsor of SC Beach Advocates. Since 1989, we have had the privilege to provide beach management services for many South Carolina communities and are intimately familiar with the challenges they face. We are excited to support SC Beach Advocates and their ongoing mission to emphasize the importance of protecting our coast for future generations.</span></p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-attends-sc-beach-advocates-2025-annual-meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2025 Bridgehampton-Sagaponack (NY) Renourishment Project Begins</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/the-2025-bridgehampton-sagaponack-ny-renourishment-project-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/the-2025-bridgehampton-sagaponack-ny-renourishment-project-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=4362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';"><a href="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Bridge-Sag.png"><img class="alignright wp-image-4364" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Bridge-Sag-300x216.png" alt="Bridge-Sag" width="400" height="288" /></a>CSE is currently managing a renourishment project in partnership with First Coastal Corporation and the Town of Southampton (NY) to place approximately 1.2 million cubic yards of sand along 5.6 miles of oceanfront. Southampton’s Bridgehampton and Sagaponack Beach Erosion Control Districts have contracted with Great Lakes Dredge &amp; Dock Company (GLDD) to provide dredging services. GLDD is currently mobilizing to the site and is expected to begin pumping sand onto the beach within the next two weeks.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">The 2025 renourishment project is designed to supplement a previous 2013-2014 project, which placed 2.5 million cubic yards of sand along the same length of coastline. CSE had the privilege of directing this initiative, which received the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA) “Best Restored Beaches” award in 2018. These nourishment projects are part of an ongoing long-term coastal management plan to replenish sand lost due to erosion and hurricanes, increase storm protection for oceanfront properties and infrastructure, widen the recreational beach, and provide additional natural habitat for wildlife.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">Once the dredging is underway, work will occur 24/7 (including holidays) unless mechanical issues or rough sea conditions require a shutdown. Weather permitting, construction is expected to continue for approximately two months.</span></p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/the-2025-bridgehampton-sagaponack-ny-renourishment-project-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buxton Village 2022 Beach Renourishment Completed</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/buxton-village-beach-renourishment-completed/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/buxton-village-beach-renourishment-completed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=4284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';"><a href="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Buxton-2022.jpg"><img class="alignright wp-image-4286" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Buxton-2022-300x175.jpg" alt="default" width="500" height="292" /></a>On August 16, 2022, Great Lakes Dredge &amp; Dock Co. (GLDD) delivered the last load for CSE&#8217;s second beach nourishment project at the Village of Buxton. The project used two dredges (<em>Ellis Island</em> and <em>Liberty Island</em>) to pump 1.2 million cubic yards of sand along 2.9 miles of oceanfront from the Haulover Day Use Area to the ocean groin field near the former location of Cape Hatteras Lighthouse. An initial frontal dune with a typical width of 20 feet was also built along the Village of Buxton to provide storm protection along this highly eroding area.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">The Buxton renourishment project is one of two projects CSE manages for Dare County, NC. The neighboring beach fronting the Village of Avon was nourished simultaneously with Buxton to achieve optimal production and cost savings for each project. With the flexibility of having both the <em>Ellis Island</em> and the <em>Liberty Island</em> on site in Dare County, GLDD switched dredge assignments between Buxton and Avon to complete the project in 48 days, minimizing interruptions for oceanfront property owners, residents, and beachgoers.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">GLDD began the Buxton renourishment project with America&#8217;s largest hopper dredge, the <em>Ellis Island</em>, on Sunday, June 30, 2022, using a submerged pipeline near South Tower Circle. The <em>Ellis Island</em> is America&#8217;s largest dredge, with a capacity of over 10,000 cubic yards of sand per load. During the 26 days when the <em>Ellis Island</em> worked at the Buxton job site, it completed 668,000 cubic yards of sand placement. This quantity is equivalent to approximately 56 percent of the total project volume.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">By comparison, the second hopper dredge, the <em>Liberty Island</em>, has half the capacity per load, but it only requires half of the digging and pumping turnaround time. During the 20 days of working in Buxton, the <em>Liberty Island</em> was able to place approximately 532,000 cubic yards of sand. This quantity is equivalent to roughly 44 percent of the total project volume.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">Buxton&#8217;s first beach nourishment project was completed between June 21, 2017, and February 27, 2018, along the same stretch of oceanfront as the 2022 renourishment project. The primary purpose of the 2017–2018 project was to provide a wider beach and buffer storm waves along this critically eroding section of Hatteras Island. It was designed to reduce the frequency of storm damage to N.C. Highway 12 and the existing community infrastructure. Approximately 2.6 million cubic yards of beach-quality sand was excavated from an offshore borrow area and placed along the 2.9-mile stretch of shoreline.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">After project completion, the newly nourished beach withstood a series of nor&#8217;easters in March 2018. It also endured Hurricane Florence in September 2018, Hurricane Dorian in September 2019, and other winter storms without much interruption to N.C. Highway 12 traffic or damage to the Buxton oceanfront properties. However, nourishment sand was lost outside of the project area after each weather event since project completion, and Buxton returned to pre-nourishment conditions before the 2022 renourishment project was implemented. Some sand bags were exposed due to erosion, and property owners installed new sand bags as a temporary shoreline protection measure. The loss of dry beach made N.C. Highway 12 vulnerable to flooding and breaching once again.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">The 2022 renourishment is similar to the 2017–2018 nourishment in its construction method, construction window, and potential environmental impact but smaller in scale (ie – 1.2 million cubic yards in 2022 versus 2.6 million cubic yards in 2017). A significant difference between the two projects is the dune construction. No dune was constructed in 2017. Dare County chose to integrate an initial dune in the 2022 Buxton renourishment plan to establish uniform standards for enhancing dune growth and coastal resiliency. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">CSE thanks Dare County for the opportunity to serve as engineer for this successful renourishment project.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Buxton-Progress-Map.png"><img class="alignleft wp-image-4287 size-large" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Buxton-Progress-Map-1024x433.png" alt="Buxton Progress Map" width="980" height="414" /></a></p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/buxton-village-beach-renourishment-completed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSE Awarded 2022-2024 SCDHEC-OCRM Beach Erosion Data Project Contract</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-completes-2019-2021-scdhec-ocrm-beach-erosion-data-project-and-is-awarded-contract-for-2022-2024/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-completes-2019-2021-scdhec-ocrm-beach-erosion-data-project-and-is-awarded-contract-for-2022-2024/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=4241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';"><a href="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/DHEC.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4248" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/DHEC-300x113.png" alt="DHEC" width="300" height="113" /></a>CSE is pleased to continue our 8-year partnership with SCDHEC-OCRM (South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management) to monitor South Carolina’s beaches through their BERM (Beach Erosion Research and Monitoring) project. As our 2019-2021 monitoring contract comes to a close, we are honored to be awarded the 2022-2024 contract–continuing services provided to the state since 2013. Coastal monitoring is a critical element of OCRM’s coastal zone management program. This monitoring documents the health and condition of South Carolina beaches and provides data to help managers identify environmental impacts, avoid future adverse impacts, determine renourishment needs, improve storm protection, and manage beach and dune growth or recession.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">CSE brings to this project the longest history of beach monitoring in South Carolina. For over 30 years, CSE has collected topographic and bathymetric data on almost every beach and inlet in the state. Our staff is intimately familiar with South Carolina’s coastline based on prior experience mapping shorelines, designing beach nourishment projects, and performing annual monitoring for several communities. Coastal surveys are conducted on land and overwater. Land-based (topographic) surveys measure the beach and dune using a survey rod and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver. Overwater (bathymetric) data is collected on a marine vessel equipped with underwater survey equipment. These surveys are also documented with aerial and panoramic imagery captured by unmanned aerial systems (UAS). Each year, CSE collects and processes data collected at all OCRM survey sites and provides digital files to the agency for review and documentation.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: 'Open Sans';">CSE values the trust OCRM has placed in our monitoring services. We look forward to supporting the BERM project for another three years. </span></p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cse-completes-2019-2021-scdhec-ocrm-beach-erosion-data-project-and-is-awarded-contract-for-2022-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The value of beach nourishment along the South Carolina Coast</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/the-value-of-beach-nourishment-along-the-south-carolina-coast/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/the-value-of-beach-nourishment-along-the-south-carolina-coast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=3674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Click <a href="http://www.thestate.com/opinion/op-ed/article56159175.html">here</a> to read CSE president Tim Kana&#8217;s editorial in The State newspaper about the benefits of beach nourishment projects along the South Carolina coast.</p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	<div class="wpb_single_image clr wpb_content_element vc_align_none">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
			<img width="1600" height="1200" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Subline-D8-JMC-4-3-2006-4-46-46-PM.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="Subline D8 JMC 4-3-2006 4-46-46 PM" />
		</div><!-- .wpb_wrapper -->
	</div><!-- .wpb_single_image -->
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/the-value-of-beach-nourishment-along-the-south-carolina-coast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSE’s Third ASBPA Best Restored Beach</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cses-third-asbpa-best-restored-beach/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cses-third-asbpa-best-restored-beach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=3635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>ASBPA presented a Best Restored Beach Award to Charleston County Parks &amp; Recreation Commission at its annual Summit Conference in Washington (DC) in February 2016.  The award recognized the Folly Beach County Park project which restored Charleston’s most popular public beach.  This is the third CSE project recognized by ASBPA, joining our 2008 Isle of Palms (SC) and 2011 Nags Head (NC) nourishment projects.</p>
<p>The Folly Beach project was completed in 2013 and incorporated a 750-foot-long terminal groin.  As a result of the project, the park was able to reopen and provide parking for 400 vehicles.  Tom O’Rourke, Executive Director of CCPRC, said that the park would have been abandoned without the terminal groin to retain sand.  It had been nourished 11 times between 1979 and 2005, but could not retain sand being drawn off by Folly River and Stono Inlet.  Incorporating a groin into the project was the preferred alternative with lowest projected maintenance costs.</p>
<p>The project was completed on budget in record time with groin construction by The Industrial Company (TIC–Savannah GA) closely coordinated with a 400,000-cubic-yard nourishment by Marinex Construction (Charleston SC) using a hydraulic dredge.  The 2,000-foot-long project area was overfilled so that groin construction could proceed, working in-the-dry, beginning at the seaward end of the structure.  Excess sand moved downcoast around and over the structure, leaving a natural profile and beach planform upon completion.  Rentz Engineering with CSE designed the steel, sheet-pile groin with concrete cap to match the natural slope of the beach.  The resulting low profile has less reveal, preserves vistas, and allows pedestrian access downcoast.</p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	<div class="wpb_single_image clr wpb_content_element vc_align_none">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
			<img width="1000" height="750" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/IMG_3651.jpg" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="???????????????????????????????" />
		</div><!-- .wpb_wrapper -->
	</div><!-- .wpb_single_image -->
	</div> 
</div><div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-6 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/cses-third-asbpa-best-restored-beach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Numerical Modeling of Inlet Relocation Impacts</title>
		<link>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/numerical-modeling-of-inlet-relocation-impacts/</link>
		<comments>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/numerical-modeling-of-inlet-relocation-impacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coastal]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coastalscience.com/?p=3621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_single_image clr wpb_content_element vc_align_none">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
			<img width="1386" height="554" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/KiawahSpit_ShorelineChange2.png" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="KiawahSpit_ShorelineChange2" />
		</div><!-- .wpb_wrapper -->
	</div><!-- .wpb_single_image -->
	</div> 
</div><div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Kiawah spit, at the downcoast end of Kiawah Island (SC), is notoriously unstable and has breached many times over the past 500 years.  An ample supply of sand from upcoast causes spit growth and accounts for westerly migration of adjacent Captain Sams Inlet.  As the inlet migrates, it cuts into Seabrook Island and interrupts the normal flow of sand along the beach.</p>
<p>Once the history of the inlet was understood, CSE researchers and others proposed periodic relocation of the channel to an upcoast position across the spit.  The basic premise was to control the timing of spit breaches and free up sand trapped in the abandoned tidal delta.  With a new channel in place and the prior channel closed, wave action was expected to push sand onto the downcoast beach and provide sustained restoration.</p>
<p>Relocation of Captain Sams Inlet has been accomplished three times since 1983 with obvious success (see cover photos in <em>link to</em> CSE’s<a href="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CSE_Primer_ebook.pdf"> Coastal Erosion Primer</a>).  However, prior to the third relocation in 2015, several potential impact questions were raised by regulatory agencies and concerned parties:</p>
<p>1)    Would inlet relocation cause accelerated erosion along the updrift beach?</p>
<p>2)    Would the project modify tidal flows behind the spit in Kiawah River?</p>
<p>3)    Would other parts of the spit be more vulnerable to storm tides and breaching after inlet relocation?</p>
<p>CSE developed a sediment budget using nearly 30 years of profile surveys along Kiawah Island and confirmed the historical growth of the shoreline and likelihood of continued accretion along the oceanfront.  The hydraulics of Kiawah River behind the spit were analyzed using the widely applied computer model, RMA2 (US Army Corps of Engineers).  CSE surveyed the river in detail to produce an accurate model grid, then simulated flows under a range of conditions with and without inlet relocation.  The results confirmed there would only be incremental increases in peak velocities (order of 0.02–0.05 feet per second–fps) for the relocated inlet condition.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	<div class="wpb_single_image clr wpb_content_element vc_align_none">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
			<img width="523" height="575" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2282-3B.6a.png" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="2282-3B.6a" />
		</div><!-- .wpb_wrapper -->
	</div><!-- .wpb_single_image -->
	</div> 
</div><div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Modeling also demonstrated that river flows were accelerating at the neck of the spit because of marsh growth on the opposite side of the channel.  Model simulations showed that strategic excavations of the marsh “point bar” could significantly reduce peak velocities by 0.5–0.7 fps and thereby reduce the erosion pressure at the narrowest part of the spit.  This demonstrated to resource and regulatory agencies that channel narrowing by marsh growth at the neck of the spit was the principal erosion factor of concern.  Relocation of Captain Sams Inlet was permitted with support from the owner of the spit.</p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	</div> 
</div><div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	<div class="wpb_single_image clr wpb_content_element vc_align_none">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
			<img width="523" height="575" src="http://coastalscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2282-3B.08a.png" class=" vc_box_border_grey attachment-full" alt="2282-3B.08a" />
		</div><!-- .wpb_wrapper -->
	</div><!-- .wpb_single_image --><div  class="vc_row wpb_row vc_inner vc_row-fluid  " >
	<div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column column_container  ">
			
	</div> 
</div>
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>Others have developed plans to armor a section of Kiawah River shoreline where the spit is most vulnerable to breaching.  CSE’s hydraulic studies suggest that strategic marsh excavations could also provide sustainable erosion relief along the spit and help preserve a soft edge.  While marsh dredging should not be permitted in most areas, it is a less impactful alternative in the Kiawah–Seabrook area because of natural gains in marsh area over the past 30 years.  CSE’s inlet relocation projects have expanded sheltered, intertidal areas creating conditions for natural growth of salt marsh.</p>
<p>CSE’s Kiawah River hydraulic study illustrates the comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach that we bring to our coastal erosion studies.  Modification of the coastal zone by inlet relocation, construction of jetties, or beach nourishment potentially impact areas well removed from the project site.  CSE uses long-term survey data, computer models, and empirical measurements to evaluate impacts and predict outcomes.  A key aspect of our Captain Sams Inlet–Kiawah River hydraulic study was our extensive, historical database for the area, which insured that the model results were interpreted accurately in the context of historical changes at the project site.</p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
	</div> 
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coastalscience.com/uncategorized/numerical-modeling-of-inlet-relocation-impacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
